Difference between revisions of "Examples/2D/souto etal 2012 standingwave"
(Created the theory) |
m |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
In our simulation <math>g = 1</math>, <math>L = 1</math>, <math>\varepsilon = 0.1</math>, <math>\rho = 1</math> and <math>H / \Delta x = 100</math>, where <math>\Delta x</math> is the initial distance between the particles. | In our simulation <math>g = 1</math>, <math>L = 1</math>, <math>\varepsilon = 0.1</math>, <math>\rho = 1</math> and <math>H / \Delta x = 100</math>, where <math>\Delta x</math> is the initial distance between the particles. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Setting up the simulation == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> |
Revision as of 13:14, 12 March 2015
Introduction
In this examples we are reproducing the simulation of the standing wave carried out by Souto et all (2012) [1].
The standing wave is defined on top of an infinite periodic fluid domain composed by rectangular subdomains of dimensions
, with
. In such domain a wave with length
(i.e. the wave number is
) and amplitude
is imposed. Denoting the ratio
by
the following velocity potential can be considered:
valid for small values of
. In previous equations
is the angular frequency given by the dispersion relation of gravity waves:
, and
corresponds to the flat free surface (In Fig. 13 of Souto et all (2012)
[1] it is wrong described)
Therefore the velocity field can be computed as
. It should be noticed that for
a flat free surface is obtained.
With such velocity potential, for a viscous fluid, it is possible to get an analytical solution for the kinetic energy decay[2]:
where the kinematic viscosity can be computed from the Reynolds number:
In our simulation
,
,
,
and
, where
is the initial distance between the particles.